Too Big To Prosecute-----How Obama/Holder Took A Powder On HSBC Frauds

By Christopher M. Matthews

U.S. Justice Department officials overruled their prosecutors’ recommendation to pursue criminal charges against  HSBC  Holdings PLC over money-laundering failings, according to a House committee report prepared by Republicans that sheds new light on the bank’s 2012 settlement.

The report, which was reviewed by The Wall Street Journal ahead of its release Monday morning and was prepared by the Republican staff of the Financial Services Committee, concluded that former Attorney General Eric Holder overruled the internal recommendation and subsequently misled Congress about the Justice Department’s decision not to prosecute the U.K. bank.

“Rather than lacking adequate evidence to prove HSBC’s criminal conduct, internal Treasury documents show that DOJ leadership declined to pursue [the] recommendation to prosecute HSBC because senior DOJ leaders were concerned that prosecuting the bank ‘could result in a global financial disaster,’ ” the 282-page report stated.

The report also said the Justice Department refused to respond to subpoenas from the committee about the settlement, so committee staff based its findings on documents turned over by the Treasury Department, which was also involved in the settlement.

Spokesmen at the Justice Department and Treasury Department declined to comment.

In December 2012, HSBC agreed to pay a then-record $1.9 billion to the Justice Department to settle allegations it failed to spot the laundered proceeds of drug trafficking in Mexico and failed to flag transactions with countries subject to economic sanctions, such as Iran. But the bank avoided entering a guilty plea, a costly outcome that could have sparked collateral consequences including the revocation of the bank’s U.S. charter. Instead, it entered into a deferred prosecution agreement.

An HSBC spokeswoman declined to comment.

Under the terms of the deal, HSBC admitted to prosecutors’ allegations, paid a fine and entered a form of corporate probation while the Justice Department reserved the right to pursue charges. If the bank bolstered its internal controls, hired a compliance monitor and undertook other changes, prosecutors would drop the charges. The bank is still being monitored.

The settlement was criticized by some Republican and Democratic lawmakers as a slap on the wrist for a bank that admitted to handling hundreds of millions of dollars in illegal narcotics sales proceeds. The controversy was exacerbated when then-Attorney General Holder suggested at a Senate hearing months after the settlement that some banks are so large and complex that prosecuting them had become difficult, in part because such a move could have broad financial ramifications.

Mr. Holder later said those comments were misconstrued and that the Justice Department doesn’t believe any institution is too large to face legal punishment. “If we find a bank or a financial institution that has done something wrong, if we can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt, those cases will be brought,” Mr. Holder said at a 2013 House hearing.

The report concluded those comments were misleading because lower-level prosecutors had recommended the department prosecute HSBC, according to Treasury Department emails subpoenaed by the committee.

Mr. Holder, through a spokesman, declined to comment.

In a series of emails in September 2012, Treasury Department officials discussed several interagency meetings in which prosecutor Jennifer Shasky Calvery indicated her team had recommended prosecuting HSBC.

“[W]e should learn whether [the] internal recommendation to ask the bank [sic] plead guilty to criminal [Bank Secrecy Act] charges was approved by senior DOJ officials,” Denis Wood, an official in Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, wrote to his colleagues.

Ms. Calvery now works in the compliance department at HSBC. She couldn’t be reached for comment.

U.K. regulators, who frequently coordinate investigations with their U.S. counterparts, were also on interagency calls summarized in the emails that the committee obtained. Those regulators indicated an HSBC conviction could cause turmoil to global financial markets, according to Treasury emails. The report concluded the involvement of U.K. regulators hampered the investigation.

Mr. Holder ultimately offered a take-it-or-leave-it deal to HSBC in November 2012, according to the report, that didn’t include a requirement the bank plead guilty but instead offered a settlement. But the offer wasn’t final and the bank was able to continue negotiations with the department, ultimately completing the deal in December 2012, the report said.

A draft version of the settlement contained language that said HSBC executives’ bonuses would be tied to compliance performance, but the final document said compensation “could” be tied to compliance, according to the report.

Read more at the Wall Street Journal

Source: Justice Department Overruled Recommendation to Pursue Charges Against HSBC, Report Says

David Stockman's Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and rebuked. Subscribe now to receive David Stockman’s latest posts by email each day as well as his model portfolio, Lee Adler’s Daily Data Dive and David’s personally curated insights and analysis from leading contrarian thinkers.